Representative Ron Paul does not think so. He believes that few public officials in the US understand the teachings of the John Paul II and Christianity more broadly. He stated that
The
Pope’s commitment to human dignity, grounded in the teachings of Christ, led
him to become one of the most eloquent spokesmen for the consistent ethic of
life, exemplified by his struggles against abortion, war, euthanasia, and the
death penalty.
Unfortunately,
few in American politics today adhere to the consistent ethic of life, thus we
see some who cheered the Pope’s stand against the war and the death penalty
while downplaying or even openly defying his teachings against abortion and
euthanasia.
Others
who cheered the Pope’s opposition to abortion and euthanasia were puzzled or
hostile to his opposition to war. Many of these “pro-life supporters of war”
tried to avoid facing the inherent contradictions in their position by
distorting the Just War doctrine, which the Pope properly interpreted as denying
sanction to the Iraq war. One prominent conservative commentator even suggested
that the pope was the “enemy” of the United States.
How could anyone label John Paul II an enemy of the US? I know that I should not be surprised to hear such statements but I like to think that on rare occasions, public officials will recognize that their positions do not make logical sense although they probably make political sense.